<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 26 - an association and group for writers, editors and language consultants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.26.org.uk</link>
	<description>26 is here to inspire a greater love of words, in business and in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three ways to&#8230; say no to a client by Shano</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2012/01/three-ways-to-say-no-to-a-client/comment-page-1/#comment-57964</link>
		<dc:creator>Shano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=3262#comment-57964</guid>
		<description>You mean, I can&#039;t just say, &quot;No! No! No!&quot;

(Kidding.)

Thanks for the info, Martin. Equitable is a word that comes to mind.

Your caveat in 1, however, has burned me many a time, thus my acronym: TNT! (Trust no takers!&quot;).

Also even-handed is your point 2. But when your replacement does so good a job that your client is loathe to override her work (in fact, your replacement need only do a comparable job), then you&#039;re in trouble. If you then call shotgun, you don&#039;t look like such a nice person — suggesting someone good to fill the gap, only to try to muscle in after the fact. TNT!

Point 3 is genius - time discounting... I love it. But use it wisely. You may be forced to lower your rates more than you think... &quot;Time discounting&quot; is a phenomenon whereby a desirable result in the future is thought LESS valuable than the same result NOW (for those who don&#039;t know). It can be hard to make your discount attractive to someone psychologically programmed to be suspicious of future values (who knows why we&#039;re like this). Getting 100 euros now is, for most people, better than getting 100 euros in three month&#039;s time. (In fact, 75 euros right now is more attractive than 100 euros in the future.) So it can work against you. (There&#039;s also the growth market principle whereby a growing market makes things less pricey - supplies are more available - so your client&#039;s future business might expect cheaper rates anyway, leaving you exposed.)

What can I add? 

You say reciprocity is the best defence. In my experience (and at the risk of sounding controversial), I would put it another way: have your clients owe you - always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean, I can&#8217;t just say, &#8220;No! No! No!&#8221;</p>
<p>(Kidding.)</p>
<p>Thanks for the info, Martin. Equitable is a word that comes to mind.</p>
<p>Your caveat in 1, however, has burned me many a time, thus my acronym: TNT! (Trust no takers!&#8221;).</p>
<p>Also even-handed is your point 2. But when your replacement does so good a job that your client is loathe to override her work (in fact, your replacement need only do a comparable job), then you&#8217;re in trouble. If you then call shotgun, you don&#8217;t look like such a nice person — suggesting someone good to fill the gap, only to try to muscle in after the fact. TNT!</p>
<p>Point 3 is genius &#8211; time discounting&#8230; I love it. But use it wisely. You may be forced to lower your rates more than you think&#8230; &#8220;Time discounting&#8221; is a phenomenon whereby a desirable result in the future is thought LESS valuable than the same result NOW (for those who don&#8217;t know). It can be hard to make your discount attractive to someone psychologically programmed to be suspicious of future values (who knows why we&#8217;re like this). Getting 100 euros now is, for most people, better than getting 100 euros in three month&#8217;s time. (In fact, 75 euros right now is more attractive than 100 euros in the future.) So it can work against you. (There&#8217;s also the growth market principle whereby a growing market makes things less pricey &#8211; supplies are more available &#8211; so your client&#8217;s future business might expect cheaper rates anyway, leaving you exposed.)</p>
<p>What can I add? </p>
<p>You say reciprocity is the best defence. In my experience (and at the risk of sounding controversial), I would put it another way: have your clients owe you &#8211; always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling all poets from a 26 exile in NYC by mike benson</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/12/calling-all-poets-from-a-26-exile-in-nyc/comment-page-1/#comment-46406</link>
		<dc:creator>mike benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=3134#comment-46406</guid>
		<description>Hey guys

Thanks for posting this.
Just to be clear, I&#039;m not a Berliner. My company is called Berliner Benson. It&#039;s a partnership between Claire Berliner and I. I&#039;m actually a Glaswegian.

I would love to invite 26 members to participate in the project - those of you who are poets. There have been quite a few requests and we&#039;d be very grateful if any quality writers want to lend a writer&#039;s hand.

Thanks, Mike Benson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this.<br />
Just to be clear, I&#8217;m not a Berliner. My company is called Berliner Benson. It&#8217;s a partnership between Claire Berliner and I. I&#8217;m actually a Glaswegian.</p>
<p>I would love to invite 26 members to participate in the project &#8211; those of you who are poets. There have been quite a few requests and we&#8217;d be very grateful if any quality writers want to lend a writer&#8217;s hand.</p>
<p>Thanks, Mike Benson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The child inside &#8211; another treasure trail by Mike Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/10/the-child-inside-another-treasure-trail/comment-page-1/#comment-36661</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2743#comment-36661</guid>
		<description>I’m in, John. If there’s room. Lovely idea. I was born in 1970, but will need a little longer to think about the most precious object...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m in, John. If there’s room. Lovely idea. I was born in 1970, but will need a little longer to think about the most precious object&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Favourite children&#8217;s book vox pop by Andy Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/09/favourite-childrens-book-vox-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-33703</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2533#comment-33703</guid>
		<description>The Mr Gum series is an Electric Kool Aid Acid Test for ten year olds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mr Gum series is an Electric Kool Aid Acid Test for ten year olds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 121 with John Simmons and Jamie Jauncey by richard pelletier</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/07/121-with-john-simmons-and-jamie-jauncey/comment-page-1/#comment-31062</link>
		<dc:creator>richard pelletier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2092#comment-31062</guid>
		<description>Feedback by Billy Collins

The women
who wrote from Phoenix
after my reading there
to tell me they were
all still talking about it,
just wrote again
to tell me
that they had stopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedback by Billy Collins</p>
<p>The women<br />
who wrote from Phoenix<br />
after my reading there<br />
to tell me they were<br />
all still talking about it,<br />
just wrote again<br />
to tell me<br />
that they had stopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holiday companion vox pop &#8211; August 2011 by Robert Mighall</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/08/holiday-companion-vox-pop-august-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-30729</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Mighall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2446#comment-30729</guid>
		<description>John gets the prize for my money. Beautiful ironic inversion economically invoked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John gets the prize for my money. Beautiful ironic inversion economically invoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holiday reading vox pop &#8211; July 2011 by Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/07/holiday-reading-vox-pop-july-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-27836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2119#comment-27836</guid>
		<description>Actually forget Roxy and Bob Marley (admirable though they are). I&#039;ve just got hold  of &#039;Life&#039; by Keith Richards. Sunbedtastaic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually forget Roxy and Bob Marley (admirable though they are). I&#8217;ve just got hold  of &#8216;Life&#8217; by Keith Richards. Sunbedtastaic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holiday reading vox pop &#8211; July 2011 by andy hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/07/holiday-reading-vox-pop-july-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-27824</link>
		<dc:creator>andy hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=2119#comment-27824</guid>
		<description>&#039;Ordinary Thunderstorms&#039; by William Boyd for me. Every day I see the opening page on Kindle ads, tempting me to read it. I&#039;ve had it a few months now. Bought it off a lovely old lady with whiskers at Teddington Lock collecting for the RNLI. 50p. A bargain. That&#039;ll pay for half a tot of rum, probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Ordinary Thunderstorms&#8217; by William Boyd for me. Every day I see the opening page on Kindle ads, tempting me to read it. I&#8217;ve had it a few months now. Bought it off a lovely old lady with whiskers at Teddington Lock collecting for the RNLI. 50p. A bargain. That&#8217;ll pay for half a tot of rum, probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editors edited by Gillian Colhoun</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/06/editors-edited/comment-page-1/#comment-22896</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Colhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=1950#comment-22896</guid>
		<description>A word of thanks to Jim and Nick for doing such a brilliant job. Over the years, the arrival of the 26 newsletter has always been a welcome distraction in my inbox. Particularly in moments when the drawers in my brain labelled &#039;ideas &amp; inspiration&#039; were looking especially sparse. And good luck to Elen and Anna. Your efforts are much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word of thanks to Jim and Nick for doing such a brilliant job. Over the years, the arrival of the 26 newsletter has always been a welcome distraction in my inbox. Particularly in moments when the drawers in my brain labelled &#8216;ideas &amp; inspiration&#8217; were looking especially sparse. And good luck to Elen and Anna. Your efforts are much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Write better, not more by Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.26.org.uk/index.php/2011/05/write-better-not-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19414</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 09:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26.org.uk/?p=1817#comment-19414</guid>
		<description>At the risk of sounding like a &#039;fanboy&#039; Tom, that&#039;s a splendid, insightful, honest and affirming piece.

Thanks....again.

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding like a &#8216;fanboy&#8217; Tom, that&#8217;s a splendid, insightful, honest and affirming piece.</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;.again.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

